LEDS-Level track · step 2 of 4. This model is five machines in series.
At a glance
| Experiment | Single Run |
| Duration | 90 days |
| System efficiency | 54.0% |
| Production | 7.00M bottles · ~70,000 pallets |
| Output unit | bottles |
What this model is
LEDS track, 5-Constraint model — same five-serial-Constraint topology as the Constraint-Level version, with LEDS drill-down into named failure modes. Same throughput as all other siblings (~54% OEE, ~7M bottles) — rollup doesn't change the prediction. But now you see the full 2×2 hierarchy: machine-level rollup × itemized drill-down. The Capper is the clear bottleneck at 75.7% availability, driven mostly by Capper_Upper Plow Area (53% of Capper downtime). Compare to the Constraint-Level sibling where the Case Packer only looked worst by chance. The drill-down tells you where to invest; the machine-level tells you which machine.
The line
| Node | Type | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk Storage | Buffer | ∞ supply |
| Filler | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Capper | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Labeler | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Case Packer | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Palletizer | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Warehouse | Buffer | ∞ capacity |
Five serial Constraints with LEDS-driven interrupts (36 real) · OEE 54.0% · bottleneck: Capper at 75.7% avail · 7.00M bottles
The same topology on the other track
Five Constraints in Series, Five Interrupts runs this structure against constraint-level interrupt data. It reports 54.7% efficiency against 54.0% here — the throughput prediction barely moves. What changes is what the model can tell you about the cause.
Open it
This model ships with ReliaSim and runs in the browser sandbox — no install required. Open 5 Constraints in the sandbox.
Every figure on this page is the published result for the model as it ships. Open it and re-run to reproduce.