LEDS-Level track · step 3 of 4. This model is two constraints and three converters, bottles to cases to pallets.
At a glance
| Experiment | Single Run |
| Duration | 90 days |
| System efficiency | 54.3% |
| Production | 70,361 pallets |
| Output unit | pallets |
What this model is
LEDS track, Converter model — Converters added, output in pallets. The Capper is still the bottleneck (75.4% avail), with Capper_Upper Plow Area at 54% of Capper downtime. Converters don't change where the bottleneck is — the interrupt pattern on the Capper Constraint does.
The line
| Node | Type | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk Storage | Buffer | ∞ supply |
| Filler | Converter | 100/min |
| Capper | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Labeler | Constraint | 100/min · 1 interrupt |
| Case Packer | Converter | 10/min · 10:1 |
| Palletizer | Converter | 1/min · 10:1 |
| Warehouse | Buffer | ∞ capacity |
Converter-model topology with LEDS interrupts · OEE 54.3% · bottleneck: Capper 75.4% · ~70k pallets · Upper Plow Area 54% of Capper downtime
Experiments this model carries
- Interrupt Loss/Gain — ranks failure modes by the production they cost — see Interrupt Loss/Gain Results
Questions it answers
- Ask how the 10:1 / 10:1 conversions flow through or how the Capper's failure modes differ from the Labeler's.
The same topology on the other track
Two Constraints, Three Converters — Bottle to Pallet Conversion runs this structure against constraint-level interrupt data. It reports 54.1% efficiency against 54.3% here — the throughput prediction barely moves. What changes is what the model can tell you about the cause.
Open it
This model ships with ReliaSim and runs in the browser sandbox — no install required. Open 2 Constraints + 3 Converters in the sandbox.
Every figure on this page is the published result for the model as it ships. Open it and re-run to reproduce.